| |
By Karin Jegalian
|
A baby provokes all kinds
of reactions in adults—protectiveness and delight,
cooing and silly faces, and, in a
small segment of the population
concentrated in the University
of Maryland faculty, curiosity—curiosity about what these small
beings can reveal about the
unadorned human brain.
|
 |
In Amanda
Woodward's lab,
set up like small
theaters, researchers
track how long
babies watch
various behaviors
and use eye trackers
to reveal exactly
what a baby is
watching. The
experiments yield
insights into human
development and
provide practical
insights on how
babies learn—
not through
technologies like
videos but by
interacting with
the world.
|
Why Study Babies?
“They’re an interesting population because they’re close to
just what nature brings,” says Amanda Woodward, professor
of psychology, who studies cognitive development in
infants as young as 3 months old. Infant researchers maintain
that looking at behavior before experience, language
or even the ability to walk have shaped the mind helps
reveal what it means to be a human being.
Infant researchers want to understand how experience
interacts with our innate biology to understand normal
development and also to put the study of developmental
disorders—such as autism, language disorders and motor
disorders—on sounder footing. For example, says Jeffrey
Lidz, an associate professor of linguistics who studies language
acquisition, “If you can’t understand how unimpaired
kids learn language, you will never understand what can go
wrong in the process.”
Studying Inarticulate People
Infant research takes patience.One way researchers try to
infer the thoughts of babies, who may barely be able to control
their heads let alone answer questions, is by measuring
what they look at and for how long. While infant researchers’ waiting rooms are typically brightly decorated, their test labs
tend to look like sparse theater spaces. Dark, or at least plain, surroundings keep the focus on just a few key elements. With
parent and baby seated, a toy and a hand may peek out from
behind a drape. A camera discreetly videotapes the baby’s
face; an undergraduate researcher in another room taps out
where the baby is looking—now the toy, now the hand—
in fraction-of-second increments.
Researchers test what catches babies’ interest. Woodward,who studies how babies view people, gathers
data from watching large numbers of babies and pools
the data to infer what interests babies in general. She has
found that as early as 3 months, babies distinguish people
from inanimate objects. For example, after a baby
repeatedly sees a hand reaching for one of two toys, 6-month-old or even 3-month-old babies suddenly
perk up when a hand grabs a new toy, more than if the hand
reaches for the same toy in a new position.
“In almost every experiment, incidental changes in how a
hand moves are uninteresting, but changes in goals are riveting,” explains Woodward. If a mechanical claw performs the
same behavior, babies look at new movements and new
“goals”with equal interest. Apparently,babies care about the
intentions of people but not of mechanical devices.
Language acquisition researchers, like Lidz and
Rochelle Newman, associate professor of hearing and
speech sciences, also use visual preference experiments.
They find, for example, that babies will look longer when
a sound matches what they’re seeing, whether a moving
mouth or an oscillating pattern of sound waves. Language
acquisition researchers also use a method called head-turn
preference, in which lights flash in front of and then on
either side of a baby in coordination with particular sounds.
The researchers can measure what babies like to listen to.
Lidz studies how babies learn linguistic concepts to
explore humans’ innate sense of grammar. “The way we see
what’s innate is by seeing how we learn,” he says. For example,
babies seem to have an inborn sense of how words are
grouped into meaningful phrases. Also, babies learn the
meanings of words from context. He found, for instance,
that 16-month-old babies understand the meaning of the
invented word “blicket” differently when one says,“He’s
tapping the blicket,” or “He’s tapping with the blicket.”
Newman, who studies speech perception in people
ranging in age from 4 months to adulthood, has tested
babies’ ability to hear words through noise. She has
found that infants less than a year old are sensitive
to background noise and not able to hear
their name if the surrounding
noise is as high as it
is, say, in the average
daycare. She has also
found that babies
are attuned to specifics. “Babies are surprisingly sensitive to irrelevancies,”
she says, such as pitch, tone or whether a word is spoken by
a man or woman. It takes time for them to distinguish
important differences in language from those irrelevancies.
Being exposed to the same words in a breadth of ways—as
babies who spend part of their time in daycare might be—
gives babies a chance to sort out which variations matter.
Newman has been tracking a relatively small group of children
from 7 months into their early school years to test
what skills early on predict language skills later.
Take these baby steps to nurture your baby
Courtesy of
Maryland
professors who
work with infants
and toddlers. |
Expose babies to a variety
of speakers so they learn
general rules for language
and what’s irrelevant. |
| Make sure babies
aren’t exposed to loud
background noise all
the time—they can’t
hear individual words as
clearly when there’s too
much interference. |
| Remove clutter to help
babies move around easily. |
| Allow babies to play
with many toys (even
something as simple as
pulling a cloth to move
a toy on top) to provide
insight into how the
world works. |
Like Newman, Jane Clark, professor and chair of kinesiology,
follows relatively small groups of babies as they grow.
Clark studies posture control, or how babies systematically
learn to balance the segments of their body—from the
head to the trunk to the legs—to sit up, stand up and then
walk. She uses virtual reality experiments to tease out the
links among the four senses that tell us where our bodies
are: our eyes, our sense of touch, the vestibular system in
our inner ears that gives us a sense of balance, and the proprioreceptors
in our joints and muscles that give us a sense
of how our limbs are positioned. By seeing how babies
respond to divergent inputs through these senses, Clark
studies how these senses are fused.
In her testing lab, light displays on the walls can give
babies an artificial sense of motion. Similarly, a moving
touch bar may give another, possibly conflicting, indication
of motion. Infants sit or stand on a platform that tracks
their center of gravity, and sensors attached to babies’ heads,
shoulders and lower backs track subtle body movements.
By looking at motor skills in babies, before the skills
become routine, Clark studies how the brain gains mastery
over the body. “My research is focused on how the brain
connects to the muscles to do the things we do almost
automatically,” she says. “The mapping of the environment
to the brain to the muscles is very complicated.”
The Payoff of Studying Babies
Babies can shed light on the core abilities of our species.
Among these are walking, talking and being attuned to
other people. Studies also prove when babies learn particular
skills and what constitutes normal variation. In motor
development,we know that whether babies walk at 9
months or 18 months does not predict their motor skills
and development later. In language acquisition, it’s not yet
clear what early skills may or may not be a harbinger of
later skills, a question Newman is addressing.
Studying infants also gives clues to those trying to raise
them on how to promote their development, or at least not get
in the way. For example, Clark suggests that “vestibular stimulation” —
rocking babies of 3 or 4 months back and forth while
they are standing on our thighs — can promote their sense of
physicalmastery. By making sure babies’ spaces aren’t too cluttered,
we can encourage their exploration and give them “a
sense of efficacy.” Excessive background noise can impede language
development,but exposing babies to a variety of speakers
can encourage it, Newman’s research suggests.
Whatever it is that babies need, they certainly don’t seem to
need instructional technology. Simply interacting
with the world fills
theirminds. “Babies are
developmental
machines,” says
Woodward. “They are
built to actively create
the learning experiences
that they need.” TERP
Want to learn more?
Join the University of Maryland Alumni Association now to automatically receive Terp Magazine and to stay connected to the University of Maryland community.
| |